deflation: be seen as problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as problem 1.00
has state problem 0.85
be problem for economy 0.80
be considered bad thing 0.80
is economic problem 0.79
be considered thing 0.78
be regarded as worse 0.77
be considered bad 0.76
is bad thing 0.76
be problem in japan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deflation, is economic problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(deflation, is bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is economic problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deflation, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, is economic problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(deflation, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(deflation, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(deflation, is economic problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(deflation, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deflation, be problem for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)