deflation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad tutor2u 0.87
has quality worse 0.87
be bad 0.86
be good 0.82
be bad for country 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be considered bad 0.78
be considered bad thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(problem, be bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(problem, be bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(deflation, be good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(deflation, be good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(deflation, is bad thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(deflation, be good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(deflation, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(deflation, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bubble, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bubble bath, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)