deflation: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good 0.86
has quality worse 0.84
is bad tutor2u 0.78
be bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(problem, be bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(problem, be bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality worse)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bubble bath, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(deflation, be good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(deflation, be good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(deflation, be good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality worse)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bubble, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(deflation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)