deflation: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
has state problem 0.84
be problem for economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(deflation, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deflation, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(deflation, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deflation, be problem for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)