dehydration: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.67
, cause
Weight: 0.66
, condition
Weight: 0.64
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.36
, hypoglycemia
Weight: 0.36
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.35
, exhaustion
Weight: 0.35
, blood poisoning
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be problem for people 0.90
be different from problems 0.82
be problem for people suffering 0.82
be research problem 0.82
is issue 0.78
has state last 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dehydration, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(exhaustion, has state last)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(exhaustion, has state last) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(exhaustion, has state last)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dehydration, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dehydration, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dehydration, be problem for people suffering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dehydration, is issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(dehydration, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(dehydration, be problem for people suffering)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dehydration, be problem for people suffering)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, be problem for people suffering)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dehydration, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(exhaustion, has state last)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)