delaware: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
was good 0.84
be good for business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(state, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(state, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(delaware, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(delaware, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(delaware, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(delaware, was good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(delaware, was good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, was good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)