delaware: was established

Related concepts

Parents	state Weight: 0.60 , place Weight: 0.59 , maryland Weight: 0.58 , city Weight: 0.55 , law Weight: 0.55
Siblings	wilmington Weight: 0.56 , wyoming Weight: 0.35 , tennessee Weight: 0.34 , arkansas Weight: 0.34 , springfield Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was established	1.00
was established as colony	0.84
was formed	0.83
was created	0.80
was built	0.79
was founded	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(maryland, was founded) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(delaware, was established)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(maryland, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(delaware, was established)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(law, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(delaware, was established)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(law, was created)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(wyoming, was founded)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(maryland, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(delaware, was established)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(maryland, was founded) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(delaware, was established)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(law, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(delaware, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(wyoming, was founded) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(wyoming, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(delaware, was established)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(delaware, was created)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(delaware, was formed)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(delaware, was established as colony)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(delaware, was built)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(delaware, was established as colony)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(delaware, was built)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(delaware, was established as colony)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(delaware, was built)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established as colony)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(delaware, was created)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(delaware, was created)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was built)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was founded)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was created)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(delaware, was founded)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(delaware, was founded)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(delaware, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(delaware, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(law, was created)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(wyoming, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(law, was created)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(delaware, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)