delaware: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was created 0.84
was established 0.83
was founded 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(maryland, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(law, was created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, was founded)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(maryland, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(wyoming, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wyoming, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(delaware, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was created)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was founded)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(delaware, was created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(delaware, was created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, was established)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(delaware, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(delaware, was founded)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(delaware, was established)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(delaware, was founded)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, was established)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wyoming, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)