delegate: be in college apportioned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.56
, election
Weight: 0.54
, ticket
Weight: 0.50
Siblings james wilson
Weight: 0.49
, general election
Weight: 0.33
, senator
Weight: 0.32
, observer
Weight: 0.32
, diplomat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in college apportioned 1.00
be in electoral college apportioned 0.94
be allocated in one-person race 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(delegate, be in college apportioned)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(delegate, be in electoral college apportioned)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(delegate, be allocated in one-person race)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be in electoral college apportioned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(delegate, be allocated in one-person race)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(delegate, be in electoral college apportioned)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delegate, be in electoral college apportioned)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(delegate, be allocated in one-person race)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be allocated in one-person race)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be in college apportioned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(delegate, be in college apportioned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(delegate, be in college apportioned)