delegate: were established in primary elections

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.56
, election
Weight: 0.54
, ticket
Weight: 0.50
Siblings james wilson
Weight: 0.49
, general election
Weight: 0.33
, senator
Weight: 0.32
, observer
Weight: 0.32
, diplomat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were established in primary elections 1.00
were established in elections 0.96
get distributed in primary elections 0.92
work in election 0.86
get distributed in elections 0.85
work in presidential election 0.85
be in political primaries 0.83
be chosen without primaries 0.83
work during state primaries 0.82
be in electoral college 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(delegate, were established in elections)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(delegate, were established in elections)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delegate, were established in elections)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(delegate, get distributed in primary elections)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(delegate, get distributed in primary elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(delegate, get distributed in primary elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(delegate, work in election)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(delegate, get distributed in elections)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(delegate, be chosen without primaries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(delegate, get distributed in elections)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(delegate, work in presidential election)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(delegate, be in political primaries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(delegate, work in election)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(delegate, get distributed in elections)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(delegate, be chosen without primaries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(delegate, be chosen without primaries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(delegate, work during state primaries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(delegate, be in political primaries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(delegate, work in election)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(delegate, work in presidential election)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delegate, be in political primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(delegate, work in presidential election)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(delegate, work during state primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(delegate, work during state primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be chosen without primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(delegate, get distributed in primary elections)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(delegate, be in electoral college)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(delegate, be in electoral college)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were established in elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(delegate, work in presidential election)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(delegate, be in electoral college)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(delegate, work in election)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(delegate, work during state primaries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be in political primaries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delegate, get distributed in elections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(delegate, be in electoral college)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(delegate, were established in primary elections)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(delegate, were established in primary elections)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(delegate, were established in primary elections)