deli: be at build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, store
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.39
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, grocery store
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at build 1.00
be at office build 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at build)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(deli, be at build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at build)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at build)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at build)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(deli, be at build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at build)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(deli, be at build)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at office build)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(deli, be at office build)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(deli, be at office build)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(deli, be at office build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(deli, be at build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at build)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(deli, be at build)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at build)