delivery: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, contract
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, development
Weight: 0.58
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, service station
Weight: 0.33
, bar service
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
has quality system 0.84
has quality worth 0.83
be better than quantity 0.82
has quality price 0.79
be improved 0.78
be more important than quantity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(delivery, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(delivery, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(delivery, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)