delivery: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, contract
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, development
Weight: 0.58
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, service station
Weight: 0.33
, bar service
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.83
has quality better 0.83
be worth in economy 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
has quality price 0.81
have time value 0.80
has quality system 0.77
be more important than quantity 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(option, have time value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(option, have time value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(delivery, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(delivery, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)