dell: be cheaper in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents laptop
Weight: 0.62
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, brand
Weight: 0.59
, vendor
Weight: 0.58
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.34
, ibm
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper in us 1.00
is expensive 0.80
be more expensive than lenovo 0.78
be cheaper than hp 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(laptop, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be cheaper in us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(laptop, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thinkpad, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thinkpad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thinkpad, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dell, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dell, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dell, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(laptop, be cheaper in us)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(thinkpad, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(laptop, be cheaper in us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)