dell: be cheaper than hp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents laptop
Weight: 0.62
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, brand
Weight: 0.59
, vendor
Weight: 0.58
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.34
, ibm
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than hp 1.00
be more expensive than hp 0.97
be better than hp 0.96
be more expensive than lenovo 0.79
be cheaper in us 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be cheaper in us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dell, be more expensive than hp)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(dell, be more expensive than hp)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dell, be better than hp)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(dell, be more expensive than hp)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(dell, be more expensive than hp)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(dell, be better than hp)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(dell, be better than hp)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dell, be better than hp)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(laptop, be cheaper in us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(dell, be cheaper than hp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(laptop, be cheaper in us)