demand: be for resources increasing

Related concepts

Parents	commodity Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.59 , obstacle Weight: 0.58 , account Weight: 0.58
Siblings	supply Weight: 0.34 , consumption Weight: 0.33 , fuel oil Weight: 0.32 , gasoline Weight: 0.32 , decline Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be for resources increasing	1.00
is increasing	0.90
be for resources	0.88
be for food increasing	0.88
be considered resources	0.84
be considered scarce resources	0.82
has quality resource	0.78
increase	0.77
be greater than revenue	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(factor, be considered scarce resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(demand, be for resources increasing)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(factor, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(demand, be for resources increasing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(factor, be considered resources)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(factor, be considered scarce resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(factor, be considered scarce resources)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(factor, be considered resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(supply, increase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(factor, be considered scarce resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(factor, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(supply, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(supply, increase)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(demand, be for resources increasing)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for food increasing)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(demand, be for food increasing)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(demand, increase)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(demand, be for food increasing)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(demand, increase)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(demand, increase)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(demand, be for food increasing)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(demand, be for resources increasing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(factor, be considered resources)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(factor, be considered scarce resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(supply, increase)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(factor, be considered resources)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(demand, be for resources increasing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(factor, be considered scarce resources)