demand: be important in economics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in economics 1.00
be in economics 0.98
follow from rules of economics 0.84
be important to science 0.80
be important to environmental science 0.78
be important in business 0.77
be important to economy 0.75
be important in math 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(demand, be important in economics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(demand, be important in economics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in math)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important to environmental science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(demand, be important in economics)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(demand, be important in economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(supply, be important in economics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(supply, follow from rules of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(supply, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(supply, be important to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(supply, be important to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(supply, be important to environmental science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(demand, be important in economics)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(demand, be in economics)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(demand, be in economics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(demand, be in economics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(demand, be in economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(demand, follow from rules of economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(demand, follow from rules of economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(demand, follow from rules of economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(demand, be important to environmental science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(demand, be important to environmental science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(demand, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(demand, follow from rules of economics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(demand, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(demand, be important to environmental science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(demand, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important to environmental science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(demand, be important in economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supply, be important in economics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supply, be important to environmental science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(supply, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)