demand: increase

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase 1.00
decrease 0.92
is increasing 0.84
work together increase 0.83
be for food increasing 0.80
be for resources increasing 0.77
is higher 0.76
be equal to average revenue 0.76
be greater than revenue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(demand, increase)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(factor, work together increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, work together increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supply, decrease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, increase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(demand, increase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supply, increase)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(supply, increase)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(supply, decrease)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(supply, decrease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(demand, increase)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(demand, be for food increasing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(demand, be equal to average revenue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(demand, be for food increasing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(demand, be for resources increasing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(demand, be for food increasing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(demand, be for resources increasing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(demand, be for resources increasing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(demand, be equal to average revenue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(demand, be for resources increasing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(demand, be for food increasing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(demand, be equal to average revenue)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(demand, be equal to average revenue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(demand, increase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supply, increase)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(supply, decrease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(demand, increase)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)