dementia: be issue of concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.71
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.71
, symptom
Weight: 0.66
, mental illness
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.39
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.38
, schizophrenia
Weight: 0.38
, psychosis
Weight: 0.38
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be issue of concern 1.00
has state concern 0.92
is issue 0.90
is health issue 0.85
is global issue 0.81
is public health issue 0.81
is social issue 0.81
has state problem 0.79
is justice issue 0.77
be problem in society 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(illness, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mental illness, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mental illness, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mental illness, is justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mental illness, is social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(illness, is social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(illness, is social issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is social issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is justice issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is global issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(illness, is global issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mental illness, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is global issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(illness, is global issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(illness, is social issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is justice issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is social issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mental illness, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(illness, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mental illness, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mental illness, is social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mental illness, is justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(illness, is social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(dementia, be issue of concern)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dementia, is issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dementia, is health issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dementia, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dementia, is health issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dementia, has state concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dementia, is public health issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dementia, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state concern)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(dementia, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dementia, is public health issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(dementia, is health issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dementia, has state concern)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dementia, is public health issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is issue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(dementia, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is public health issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is health issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mental illness, is issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mental illness, is social issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(illness, is social issue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mental illness, is justice issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(illness, is global issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mental illness, is global issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mental illness, is issue)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mental illness, is social issue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(illness, is social issue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mental illness, is justice issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(illness, is global issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mental illness, is global issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(dementia, be issue of concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)