dementia: be viewed as disability

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.71
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.71
, symptom
Weight: 0.66
, mental illness
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.39
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.38
, schizophrenia
Weight: 0.38
, psychosis
Weight: 0.38
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be viewed as disability 1.00
be considered disability 0.95
be classed as disability 0.92
has state disability 0.89
was viewed in 1930s 0.79
be viewed in work environment 0.77
be considered illness 0.77
be considered mental illness 0.77
be identified as illness 0.76
be classified as mental disorder 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(illness, has state disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mental illness, has state disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(mental illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illness, be viewed in work environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mental illness, be viewed in work environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mental illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mental illness, has state disability)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(illness, has state disability)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mental illness, was viewed in 1930s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, has state disability)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state disability)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, be viewed in work environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state disability)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be classified as mental disorder)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, be considered disability)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state disability)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, be considered disability)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered illness)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered mental illness)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(illness, has state disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mental illness, has state disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(mental illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illness, be viewed in work environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mental illness, be viewed in work environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, be considered disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, be considered disability)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(epilepsy, be considered disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, be considered disability)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state disability)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be considered illness)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered mental illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be considered mental illness)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state disability)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(eating disorder, be classified as mental disorder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be classified as mental disorder)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dementia, be viewed as disability)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dementia, be considered disability)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(dementia, be considered disability)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dementia, be considered disability)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be considered disability)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be classed as disability)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state disability)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dementia, be classed as disability)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(dementia, has state disability)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dementia, be classed as disability)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dementia, be classed as disability)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state disability)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(dementia, be identified as illness)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be identified as illness)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, has state disability)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dementia, be identified as illness)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dementia, be identified as illness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mental illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mental illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(illness, has state disability)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state disability)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, be considered disability)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be considered mental illness)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be considered illness)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(epilepsy, be considered disability)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be classified as mental disorder)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state disability)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state disability)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mental illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mental illness, was viewed in 1930s)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(illness, has state disability)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dementia, be viewed as disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state disability)