dendrite: be important in communication

Related concepts

Parents	central nervous system Weight: 0.50 , process Weight: 0.45 , structure Weight: 0.43 , case Weight: 0.41
Siblings	amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Weight: 0.31 , cerebral cortex Weight: 0.31 , phagocytosis Weight: 0.31 , neuron Weight: 0.31 , vesicle Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in communication	1.00
be in communication	0.97
be important in neural communication	0.80
communicate with one another	0.78
be important understanding	0.78
communicate	0.78
be important in business	0.76
be important in technology	0.75
be important for function	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(structure, be important understanding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in communication)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(process, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in communication)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(structure, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in communication)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(process, be in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(process, be in communication)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(structure, be important understanding)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(structure, be important in technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(process, be in communication)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(structure, be important understanding)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(neuron, communicate with one another)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(neuron, communicate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(structure, be important understanding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(process, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(structure, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(process, be in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(neuron, communicate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(neuron, communicate)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(neuron, communicate with one another) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(neuron, communicate with one another)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(dendrite, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in neural communication)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(dendrite, be important in neural communication)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(dendrite, be important in neural communication)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in neural communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dendrite, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(process, be in communication)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(structure, be important understanding)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(neuron, communicate)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(neuron, communicate with one another)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(process, be in communication)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(structure, be important understanding)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(dendrite, be important in communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)