denial: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense mechanism
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.63
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rejection
Weight: 0.34
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.32
, injustice
Weight: 0.32
, immune system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
make great 0.80
feel good 0.80
be good in school 0.75
feel bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, make great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be good in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(behavior, be good in school)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(policy, make great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(policy, make great)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be good in school)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rejection, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rejection, feel bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, make great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be good in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rejection, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(rejection, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rejection, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rejection, feel bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(denial, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(denial, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(denial, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, make great)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, be good in school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(rejection, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rejection, feel bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, make great)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, be good in school)