density: be considered intensive property

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.70
, parameter
Weight: 0.67
, characteristic
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings throughput
Weight: 0.35
, frequency
Weight: 0.35
, viscosity
Weight: 0.35
, modulus
Weight: 0.35
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered intensive property 1.00
be considered intensive physical property 0.98
is intensive property 0.97
is intensive physical property 0.96
be classified as intensive property 0.95
be considered physical property 0.85
be considered property 0.85
be called physical property 0.83
is physical property useful 0.83
is important property 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(viscosity, is important property)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(viscosity, is important property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(viscosity, is important property)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(density, be considered intensive property)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(density, is intensive property)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(density, is intensive property)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(density, be considered physical property)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(density, be considered property)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(density, be considered property)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(density, be considered physical property)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(density, be considered property)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(density, be considered property)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(density, be considered physical property)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(density, be considered physical property)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(density, is intensive property)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(density, is intensive property)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(density, be considered intensive property)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(density, be considered intensive property)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(density, be considered intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(viscosity, is important property)