dental office: be at minnesota

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office
Weight: 0.75
, business
Weight: 0.62
, dentist
Weight: 0.62
, location
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
Siblings doctor office
Weight: 0.40
, post office
Weight: 0.39
, home office
Weight: 0.38
, dentist office
Weight: 0.36
, branch
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at minnesota 1.00
be at michigan 0.84
be at maine 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dentist office, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(doctor office, be at maine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dentist office, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dentist office, be at michigan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(doctor office, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(doctor office, be at maine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(dental office, be at minnesota)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at michigan)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(dental office, be at michigan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dental office, be at michigan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(dental office, be at michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at minnesota)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dental office, be at minnesota)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dentist office, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(doctor office, be at maine)