dentist: be mean to staff

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.58
, expert
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dental office
Weight: 0.62
, surgeon
Weight: 0.36
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.36
, obstetrician
Weight: 0.35
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mean to staff 1.00
mean 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(professional, mean)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dentist, be mean to staff)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(professional, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(professional, mean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(professional, mean)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dentist, be mean to staff)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(dentist, be mean to staff)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(dentist, mean)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dentist, mean)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dentist, mean)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dentist, mean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be mean to staff)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dentist, be mean to staff)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(professional, mean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(dentist, be mean to staff)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(professional, mean)