denver: be seen as great location for romo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.58
, market
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
Siblings utah
Weight: 0.35
, cleveland
Weight: 0.35
, dallas
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.35
, houston
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as great location for romo 1.00
be seen as location for romo 0.97
be seen as great location 0.94
be seen as location 0.89
be best place live 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(utah, be best place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(houston, be best place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(houston, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(houston, be best place live)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(utah, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(utah, be best place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(denver, be seen as great location for romo)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(denver, be seen as location for romo)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(denver, be seen as location for romo)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(denver, be seen as great location)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(denver, be seen as location)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(denver, be seen as location for romo)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(denver, be seen as location)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(denver, be seen as great location)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(denver, be seen as location)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(denver, be seen as great location)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as location for romo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as location)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(denver, be best place live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(denver, be best place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(denver, be best place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(denver, be best place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(denver, be seen as great location for romo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(utah, be best place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(denver, be seen as great location for romo)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(houston, be best place live)