department store: be at idaho

Related concepts

Parents	business Weight: 0.71 , company Weight: 0.68 , store Weight: 0.68 , area Weight: 0.66
Siblings	grocery store Weight: 0.82 , hardware store Weight: 0.81 , drugstore Weight: 0.59 , chemist Weight: 0.57 , shopper Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at idaho	1.00
be at oregon	0.80
be at texas	0.78
be at washington	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(store, be at texas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(department store, be at idaho)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(store, be at texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(store, be at texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at washington)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(store, be at texas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(department store, be at idaho)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(hardware store, be at washington) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at washington)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(department store, be at idaho)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(department store, be at idaho)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(store, be at texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(hardware store, be at washington)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(department store, be at idaho) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(store, be at texas)