department store: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.71
, company
Weight: 0.68
, store
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.82
, hardware store
Weight: 0.81
, drugstore
Weight: 0.59
, chemist
Weight: 0.57
, shopper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at washington 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(company, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(department store, be at new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(company, be at new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(company, be at new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at washington)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(company, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(department store, be at new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hardware store, be at washington)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at washington)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(department store, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(department store, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(company, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at washington)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(department store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(company, be at new york)