department store: be used to miscellaneous item

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.71
, company
Weight: 0.68
, store
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.82
, hardware store
Weight: 0.81
, drugstore
Weight: 0.59
, chemist
Weight: 0.57
, shopper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to miscellaneous item 1.00
be used to buy item 0.78
list item to buy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shopper, list item to buy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(shopper, list item to buy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(shopper, list item to buy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(department store, be used to miscellaneous item)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(department store, be used to buy item)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(department store, be used to buy item)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(department store, be used to buy item)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(department store, be used to buy item)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(department store, be used to miscellaneous item)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(department store, be used to miscellaneous item)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(department store, be used to miscellaneous item) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shopper, list item to buy)