deposition: affect land form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.68
, statement
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings testimony
Weight: 0.63
, affidavit
Weight: 0.35
, filing
Weight: 0.34
, subpoena
Weight: 0.34
, transcript
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect land form 1.00
affect land 0.94
be form 0.79
is form 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(transcript, is form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(transcript, is form)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(transcript, is form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(deposition, affect land form)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(deposition, affect land)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(deposition, be form)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(deposition, affect land)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be form)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(deposition, affect land)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(deposition, affect land)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(deposition, be form)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(deposition, be form)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(deposition, affect land form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(deposition, affect land form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(deposition, affect land form)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(transcript, is form)