deposition: be beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.68
, statement
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings testimony
Weight: 0.63
, affidavit
Weight: 0.35
, filing
Weight: 0.34
, subpoena
Weight: 0.34
, transcript
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial 1.00
is useful 0.80
be important in c++ 0.78
is problematic 0.77
be helpful to earth 0.76
is effective 0.75
be useful in excel 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, is useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in c++)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(function, be useful in excel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(statement, is problematic)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deposition, be beneficial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(statement, is problematic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(function, be important in c++)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(function, be useful in excel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(statement, is problematic)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in c++)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(function, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(function, be useful in excel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(subpoena, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in c++)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(function, be useful in excel)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(statement, is problematic)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(subpoena, is effective)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(subpoena, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(deposition, be beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(deposition, be helpful to earth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be helpful to earth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(deposition, be helpful to earth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deposition, be helpful to earth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(deposition, be beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(statement, is problematic)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be important in c++)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be useful in excel)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(subpoena, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(statement, is problematic)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be important in c++)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, is useful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(deposition, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be useful in excel)