depression: be underdiagnosed in older adults

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personality disorder
Weight: 0.73
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.70
, syndrome
Weight: 0.69
, sickness
Weight: 0.68
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bulimia
Weight: 0.47
, bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.40
, psychosis
Weight: 0.39
, mental illness
Weight: 0.38
, schizophrenia
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be underdiagnosed in older adults 1.00
is underdiagnosed 0.93
diagnose in older adults 0.87
appear in young adults 0.81
be in teenagers misdiagnosed 0.80
appear in adults 0.80
is overdiagnosed 0.80
be more prevalent in females 0.80
be more prevalent in young girls 0.79
affect more males than females 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(schizophrenia, appear in young adults)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(schizophrenia, affect more males than females)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(schizophrenia, appear in young adults)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(schizophrenia, appear in young adults)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(schizophrenia, affect more males than females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(schizophrenia, affect more males than females)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(depression, diagnose in older adults)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(depression, diagnose in older adults)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(depression, diagnose in older adults)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depression, diagnose in older adults)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(schizophrenia, appear in young adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(schizophrenia, affect more males than females)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)