depth: affect quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect quality 1.00
affect autorifles 0.89
affect health 0.84
affect quality of picture 0.83
affect change 0.82
affect standard 0.82
affect business 0.82
affect play 0.81
has quality good 0.81
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dimension, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(effect, affect play)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(factor, affect health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(effect, affect play)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dimension, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dimension, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(effect, affect play)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, affect autorifles)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(width, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dimension, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(effect, affect play)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(accuracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accuracy, affect autorifles)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(accuracy, affect autorifles)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(width, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(width, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(accuracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(accuracy, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(depth, affect quality)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality of picture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(depth, affect quality of picture)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality of picture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality of picture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(effect, affect play)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(accuracy, affect autorifles)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(accuracy, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(width, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(effect, affect play)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(depth, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)