depth: be important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in art 1.00
be important in photography 0.82
be important in theatre 0.79
be important in science 0.78
be important to intps 0.77
be important at work 0.77
be important in history 0.77
be important in design 0.77
be vital to architecture 0.77
be important to architecture 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(effect, be important in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(effect, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dimension, be important to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dimension, be vital to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in theatre)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dimension, be vital to architecture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dimension, be vital to architecture)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in history)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(effect, be important in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in art)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(effect, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in art)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in art)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dimension, be important to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in art)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dimension, be vital to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in art)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in design)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(consistency, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(consistency, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important at work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(depth, be important in art)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(depth, be important in photography)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(depth, be important in photography)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in photography)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in photography)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depth, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, be vital to architecture)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(effect, be important in science)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(effect, be important in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in design)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important at work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(effect, be important in science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, be vital to architecture)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(effect, be important in history)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(depth, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dimension, be important to architecture)