depth: be important in earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in earthquakes 1.00
be between focus earthquakes 0.91
be between focus earthquakes different 0.90
be between deep focus earthquakes 0.88
be between deep focus earthquakes different 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes different)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(effect, be between focus earthquakes different)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(effect, be between focus earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(effect, be between focus earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(effect, be between focus earthquakes different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(effect, be between focus earthquakes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(effect, be between focus earthquakes different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes different)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(effect, be between focus earthquakes different)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(effect, be between focus earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(depth, be important in earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(effect, be between focus earthquakes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(effect, be between focus earthquakes different)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(effect, be between focus earthquakes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(effect, be between focus earthquakes different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(depth, be important in earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(effect, be between deep focus earthquakes different)