depth: decrease as magnification increases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
decrease as magnification increases 1.00
decrease with magnification 0.96
be increased 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(depth, decrease as magnification increases)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quality, be increased)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(quality, be increased)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be increased)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(depth, decrease as magnification increases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be increased)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be increased)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(depth, decrease as magnification increases)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(depth, decrease with magnification)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(depth, decrease with magnification)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(depth, decrease with magnification)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(depth, decrease with magnification)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(depth, decrease as magnification increases)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(accuracy, be increased)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(depth, decrease as magnification increases)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)