depth: influence picture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence picture 1.00
affect quality of picture 0.86
influence culture 0.80
influence policy 0.78
influence social policy 0.77
influence human culture 0.77
influence farming 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(factor, influence farming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(depth, influence picture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(feature, influence culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(depth, influence picture)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(feature, influence human culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(depth, influence picture)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, influence social policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(depth, influence picture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, influence social policy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(feature, influence human culture)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(feature, influence culture)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(factor, influence farming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(factor, influence farming)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(feature, influence human culture)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(feature, influence culture)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(factor, influence social policy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(feature, influence culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(depth, influence picture)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(factor, influence farming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(depth, influence picture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(feature, influence human culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(depth, influence picture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, influence social policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(depth, influence picture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(depth, influence picture)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(depth, affect quality of picture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(depth, affect quality of picture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(depth, affect quality of picture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(depth, affect quality of picture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(depth, influence picture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(factor, influence social policy)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, influence human culture)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(feature, influence culture)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(factor, influence farming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(factor, influence social policy)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, influence human culture)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(feature, influence culture)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(depth, influence picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(factor, influence farming)