depth: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.67
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.33
, talent
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, detail
Weight: 0.33
, accuracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
be in movies expensive 0.81
cost money 0.77
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(effect, cost money)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(effect, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(effect, cost money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(feature, is attractive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(effect, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(talent, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(depth, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(depth, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(effect, cost money)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(depth, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(depth, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(talent, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(talent, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(depth, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(depth, is more expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, is more expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(depth, is more expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(depth, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(talent, is attractive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(depth, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)