deputy: were to convention chosen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.57
, police officer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bailiff
Weight: 0.54
, vice president
Weight: 0.36
, secretary
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were to convention chosen 1.00
were to convention 0.94
were to constitutional convention chosen 0.92
were to constitutional convention 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(deputy, were to convention chosen)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(deputy, were to convention)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(deputy, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(deputy, were to constitutional convention)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deputy, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(deputy, were to convention)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(deputy, were to convention)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(deputy, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deputy, were to constitutional convention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(deputy, were to constitutional convention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(deputy, were to convention)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(deputy, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(deputy, were to constitutional convention)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(deputy, were to convention chosen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deputy, were to convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(deputy, were to convention chosen)