description: is literary device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.67
, name
Weight: 0.63
, type
Weight: 0.62
, piece
Weight: 0.62
Siblings phrase
Weight: 0.64
, explanation
Weight: 0.64
, section
Weight: 0.62
, list
Weight: 0.60
, tag
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is literary device 1.00
is literary 0.91
is device 0.82
is rhetorical device 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(description, is literary device)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(description, is literary)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(description, is literary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(description, is literary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(description, is device)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(description, is device)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(description, is device)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(description, is rhetorical device)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(description, is rhetorical device)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(description, is rhetorical device)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(description, is literary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(description, is rhetorical device)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(description, is device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(description, is literary device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(description, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(description, is literary device)