description: is rhetorical device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.67
, name
Weight: 0.63
, type
Weight: 0.62
, piece
Weight: 0.62
Siblings phrase
Weight: 0.64
, explanation
Weight: 0.64
, section
Weight: 0.62
, list
Weight: 0.60
, tag
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rhetorical device 1.00
is rhetorical 0.92
is device 0.83
is literary device 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(description, is rhetorical device)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(description, is device)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(description, is rhetorical)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(description, is device)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(description, is rhetorical)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(description, is device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(description, is literary device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(description, is rhetorical)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(description, is rhetorical)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(description, is literary device)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(description, is device)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(description, is literary device)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(description, is literary device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(description, is rhetorical device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(description, is rhetorical device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(description, is rhetorical device)