desert: be desolate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, environment
Weight: 0.56
, world
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.55
, mountain
Weight: 0.54
Siblings wilderness
Weight: 0.32
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.32
, planet earth
Weight: 0.32
, valley
Weight: 0.32
, cactus
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be desolate 1.00
be barren 0.85
be find in desert 0.77
be at desert 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, be at desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cactus, be at desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(desert, be desolate)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desert, be barren)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(desert, be barren)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(desert, be barren)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(desert, be barren)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desert, be desolate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(desert, be desolate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cactus, be at desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desert, be desolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cactus, be find in desert)