desertification: affect animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, effect
Weight: 0.53
, crisis
Weight: 0.52
Siblings erosion
Weight: 0.34
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect animals 1.00
affect humans 0.87
affect plants 0.80
affect environment 0.77
be important to humans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, affect humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(erosion, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(biodiversity, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, affect humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(erosion, affect plants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect plants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(erosion, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(desertification, affect animals)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(desertification, affect humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(desertification, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be important to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(desertification, be important to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(desertification, be important to humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(desertification, affect humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desertification, affect plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect plants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(desertification, affect plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect plants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(desertification, be important to humans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(desertification, affect environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(erosion, affect animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(biodiversity, affect humans)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(erosion, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(erosion, affect plants)