desertification: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, effect
Weight: 0.53
, crisis
Weight: 0.52
Siblings erosion
Weight: 0.34
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
is major concern 0.92
is environmental concern 0.86
is major environmental concern 0.84
has state problem 0.84
is serious problem 0.77
is problem brainly 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(erosion, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(erosion, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(erosion, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(desertification, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(desertification, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major concern)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(desertification, is major concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major concern)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(desertification, is major concern)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(erosion, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(desertification, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)