desertification: is major environmental concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, effect
Weight: 0.53
, crisis
Weight: 0.52
Siblings erosion
Weight: 0.34
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major environmental concern 1.00
is environmental concern 0.97
is major concern 0.92
is environmental 0.86
has state concern 0.84
is major 0.80
is serious problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is major) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(desertification, is major concern)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(desertification, is environmental)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(desertification, is environmental)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(desertification, is major concern)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major concern)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, has state concern)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(desertification, is environmental)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(desertification, has state concern)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state concern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(desertification, is major)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(desertification, is major)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major concern)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is environmental)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hunger, is major)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major)