desertification: is problem brainly

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.62 , issue Weight: 0.58 , factor Weight: 0.53 , effect Weight: 0.53 , crisis Weight: 0.52
Siblings	erosion Weight: 0.34 , biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , overpopulation Weight: 0.33 , hunger Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is problem brainly	1.00
has state problem	0.93
is serious problem	0.90
is global problem	0.87
create problems	0.80
has state concern	0.76
create problems for environment	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(erosion, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(erosion, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(erosion, has state problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(desertification, is problem brainly)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(desertification, is global problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(desertification, has state problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(desertification, create problems)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(desertification, is serious problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(desertification, has state concern)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(desertification, create problems)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(desertification, create problems)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(desertification, has state concern)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(desertification, has state concern)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(desertification, create problems)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(desertification, create problems for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(desertification, create problems for environment)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(desertification, create problems for environment)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(desertification, create problems for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(erosion, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)