desertification: is serious problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, effect
Weight: 0.53
, crisis
Weight: 0.52
Siblings erosion
Weight: 0.34
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is serious problem 1.00
is serious 0.92
is problem brainly 0.90
has state problem 0.86
is global problem 0.82
is major concern 0.80
create problems 0.77
has state concern 0.77
is major environmental concern 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(erosion, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(erosion, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(erosion, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(desertification, is serious problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(desertification, is serious)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(desertification, is global problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(desertification, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, create problems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, has state concern)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(desertification, create problems)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(desertification, is major concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(desertification, has state concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(desertification, create problems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major concern)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major concern)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(desertification, create problems)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(desertification, is major concern)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(erosion, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)