design pattern: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.78
, design
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.68
, structure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings prototype
Weight: 0.62
, observer
Weight: 0.55
, dao
Weight: 0.43
, chevron
Weight: 0.35
, herringbone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(design pattern, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)