design software: requires knowledge

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires knowledge 1.00
requires expertise 0.84
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience 0.84
requires experience 0.84
requires have aptitude for logic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design software, requires knowledge)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires expertise)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(design software, requires experience)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(design software, requires expertise)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(design software, requires expertise)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(design software, requires experience)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(design software, requires experience)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires expertise)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires experience)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires knowledge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(design software, requires knowledge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(design software, requires knowledge)