design: be expensive in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in india 1.00
be higher in india 0.91
be higher than usa 0.81
be in australia 0.80
is high in america 0.80
cost computers in delhi 0.79
is uk 0.79
cost computers in new delhi 0.79
be higher in europe 0.78
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cost, cost computers in new delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cost, be higher in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cost, be higher than usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher than usa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher in europe)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cost, be in australia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cost, cost computers in new delhi)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cost, cost computers in new delhi)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in europe)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher than usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chevron, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(logo, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cost, cost computers in new delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cost, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cost, be higher in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cost, be higher than usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(logo, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(logo, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chevron, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chevron, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(design, be expensive in india)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(design, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(design, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(design, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, be higher than usa)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in india)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in europe)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cost, be in australia)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cost, cost computers in new delhi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(logo, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chevron, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, be higher than usa)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in europe)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cost, be in australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cost, cost computers in new delhi)